> I already know where your numbers come from: the Quadrennial Technology Review by the US Department of Energy from around 10 years ago.

That turns out not to be the case.

Even if it were the case: an official study by the DOE was "thoroughly debunked", in your esteemed opinion, because some random Australian twitter user claims to have talked to a friend.

Right.

He claims no such things. Instead he goes deep down the rabbit hole, brings back receipts and takes no prisoners.

Citation still needed. Real one will not come as it's nonsense.