You can't manage a winter load with batteries (and no country on earth does it), batteries would need a 100x improvement for that purpose.

▲

thijson 3 days ago | parent [-]

Yes, I looked into it. To store a few days worth of electricity I would need maybe 100kWh of battery storage. Right now I think battery storage costs around $100 per kWh. A whole season of electricity would be prohibitively expensive.

▲

pfdietz 2 days ago | parent [-]

Using batteries for long term storage is one of the classic bullshit moves of anti-renewable arguments. There are much cheaper options at scale.

▲

realusername 2 days ago | parent [-]

Cheaper solutions which no-one bothered to implement until now. The proof is in the pudding.

	▲	pfdietz 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		If fossil fuels are available and cheap, unburdened by the cost of their negative externalities, of course they will be chosen instead of a more expensive CO2-free alternative. That's what killed the nuclear renaissance in the US ~15 years ago. What this means is there's low hanging fruit to solve these problems in other ways, once fossil fuels are no longer allowed to pollute without cost. There are already good ideas for solving the long term storage problem, with many of the component technologies already existing for other purposes.