▲ | lovich 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> You keep insisting that H-1B or any temporary visas are for the jobs that cannot be filled by Americans. This is simply not true. As a de facto description of the current situation in the United States I agree with you. The de jure description for why h1bs would be allowed is due to them, again _ostensibly_, having skills or a specific skillset that could not be found in a reasonable time frame and are worth importing. I am trying to game theory out ways to make the h1b system achieve the ostensible goals. I am not trying to defend the current system as it stands edit: I realized this might be our point of contention right now > There are no such requirements so you whole reasoning is based on a fantasy. I was under the impression that h1bs positions were supposed to pay a “higher than prevailing wage” but there has been a surge of activity around these terms the past few months on the internet and I can’t find definitive proof of that. If that fact isn’t true it would modify my view on the system | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | pandaman 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>The de jure description for why h1bs would be allowed is due to them, again _ostensibly_, having skills or a specific skillset that could not be found in a reasonable time frame and are worth importing. There is no such description in law (this is what de jure means) so I have no clue why you think so. >I was under the impression that h1bs positions were supposed to pay a “higher than prevailing wage” They are. It does not mean they are for jobs, which cannot be done by an American worker, ostensibly or otherwise. | |||||||||||||||||
|