Proton does not require a shred of proof that you are a real human being either, fyi. I'm not actually attacking them for this specifically, because I feel that we need privacy focused tools, however the fact that I was able to create a few hundred proton email addresses in seconds by injecting usernames/passwords was scary, even to me. I'm surprised they aren't on spam block lists worldwide. Their captcha is child's play that a script can defeat with simple image examination. i encourage them to buff up their spam controls, just a bit, and decrease moderation by a lot unless they can promptly deal with cases such as this.

▲

immibis 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Their controls are buffed up: all of those accounts are linked due to having been created with the same IP address. If one is blocked, they all are. If you try to circumvent this with a well-known proxy (such as Tor or a V"P""N") you will find that captcha activation will not exist as an option.

▲

crossroadsguy 3 days ago | parent [-]

That definitely doesn't look good for privacy POV. If they do not want abuse, they ought to use other means. They should not associate IPs with account creation. That is kind of scary. In fact, if what you have said is true, then one's account can be blocked by someone else's mischief on the same IP, which is not very uncommon at all i.e sharing the IP.

▲

RandomBacon 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Proton is not a true privacy-advocate in my opinion.

I wanted to try Proton out when they were having a sale, but I could not complete the purchase because I was on Mullvad's VPN.

I created a ticket, and when they got back to me 5 days later, they told me to disconnect from the VPN to sign up for Proton.

▲

estimator7292 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They could take government ID, or fingerprint your machine, make you submit a picture of your face, do these options seem better to you?

▲

johnisgood 2 days ago | parent [-]

Nope. Zero-knowledge proofs seem to be the middle ground, IMO. Prove X without revealing X itself.

▲

immibis 2 days ago | parent [-]

Nice. I can create 5000 different proofs that I am a human and the site can't tell they're all for the same human.

	▲	johnisgood 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Not necessarily. Ever heard of linkable systems? They can detect when multiple proofs come from the same person, even if they can't identify who that person is. The system can also force reuse of the same secret, which stops the "infinite proof factory" problem. Unique secrets can also be tied directly to identity. For example, if the ZKP is about knowledge of a secret key bound to your identity, then you can't just mint 5000 independent proofs unless you also have 5000 identities. There's also the concept of nullifiers, used in privacy-preserving identity protocols. A nullifier is basically a one-time marker derived from your identity secret that prevents double-use of a proof. On top of that, zk-SNARK-based credentials or verifiable credentials can prove "I am a unique registered person" without revealing which one. These systems enforce uniqueness at registration, so you can't magically spawn 5000 ZKPs that all look like 5000 humans. Similar ideas exist with linkable ring signatures and even biometric-based ZK proofs. So there are plenty of ways to counteract your "5000 ZKPs per human" story (what's usually called a Sybil attack). If you're being pedantic, yes: a bare ZKP alone doesn't enforce "one proof = one person", but ZKP + uniqueness enforcement (nullifiers, credentials, commitments, etc.) does, and that's what I had in mind. I thought it was obvious, but then again, nothing is obvious, and I should have specified. My bad. In any case, people ought to know just how powerful and useful these ZKP-based systems can be when designed properly. I think this is the only way forward if we want to preserve our privacy, and at the same time we want to prove we're human without sacrificing anonymity, or verify we know the password without revealing it, or prove we're eligible to vote without revealing our identity, or demonstrate we meet age requirements without showing our birthdate, or verify we have sufficient funds without disclosing our balance, or show we're authorized to access something without revealing our credentials, or verify our qualifications without exposing personal details, and so on. Edit: excuse the technical brain dump, I literally just woke up. I hope this helps to clear up some things, however. Happy to dig deeper if you want.

▲

Yoric 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

How else?

▲

privatelypublic 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I dropped Proton when a ton of services (all the major A and B tier cloud providers I tried for starters) could not/would not activate an account with a proton email.

Email is a critical infrastructure these days. Most people have neither the time nor the will to deal with emails failing to send and/or be delivered. (Send or receive)