▲ | BolexNOLA 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t disagree with your point overall but the sad reality is that Charlie Kirk was not there to have a discussion. He went around trolling people and provoking big responses at universities so he could farm it out on social media. A huge part of his income was being a troll. That does not mean he deserved to die. He didn’t. But he did not die undergoing some noble endeavor or engaging in free speech in some profoundly brave way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | xtracto 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
But that's my point. Where is the guy with the opposing view and sharp tongue that's able to talk back to him? The fact that its monetized is good. Talking should be attractive to people. I'm all in favor of that. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|