This is why DEI is so important. It’s a blunt tool, but still a tool, to short circuit the basic human desire to be within their network.

▲

pessimizer 4 days ago | parent [-]

That's not what DEI does in practice. When you move away from merit hiring, you just end up hiring the minorities in your social network. Who, if they're from an "underprivileged" group, are usually even more privileged within that group than you are in yours, or else they wouldn't have met you.

i.e. you're in the top 20% of white people hiring from the top 1% of black people.

	▲	coredog64 4 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		At Amazon how I saw this work out was that we hired African immigrants rather than ADOS African-Americans. Hilariously, we had an executive who said that his goal was to have the demographics of his division more closely resemble that of America. Until someone realized that South Asians are approximately 2% of the US population and were 50% of his division. It's been years since I checked, but for non-DC jobs, Amazon's demographics are significantly less white than America as a whole. That's mainly Asians being hired in place of ADOS African-Americans and hispanics.
	▲	lazide 4 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Or ‘even better’, someone in the same circle who can somehow check the box you need. Harvard grads hiring other Harvard grads, etc. Coarse grained attributes like race, gender, sex, religion, etc. are not useful predictors of individual behavior or background.