Probably closer to the first situation. It curb stomped ArcGIS in the geographic information system community. When I started working with GIS at work, expensive ESRI products were default in this market, a la matlab in another field. Most coleages of mine had not heard about QGIS. Now QGIS is ubiquitous. It did to ArcGIS and its countless paid add on modules what scipy/numpy did to matlab.

▲

ingenieroariel 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

The scipy/numpy to matlab is a good example. In my opinion it is on its way but in many places the timing is more like 2010-2013 where a lot of people knew python was the future but universities still used only Matlab.

▲

snypher 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

>It curb stomped ArcGIS in the geographic information system community

Maybe for home or casual use, sure. I use a ~$4500/y Esri license level and it's worth every penny.

Also, plenty of people are still using matlab!

	▲	hyperman1 4 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Interesting. I see a lot of people around me using QGIS and all kinds of both free and paid gis tools. I never worked with ArcGIS, except for importing their files, but it seems to be universally loathed around here, even if licensing and money is not the problem. So what are the places where ArcGIS does better?
	▲	thirtygeo 4 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I totally disagree. I switched off this license, and also ALSO saved additional because Spatial Analyst costs extra (all included by default in QGIS)