There is still a taboo against a nuclear weapons state directly striking another nuclear weapons state, under its own flag.

▲

HarHarVeryFunny 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Why would you need a nuke to take out a drone factory? There's lots of ways to disrupt production, starting with super low-tech things like drone attacks, assuming you have the intelligence to know where they are being produced.

▲

AlecSchueler 2 days ago | parent [-]

> Why would you need a nuke to take out a drone factory?

They didn't suggest you would need to.

> low-tech things like drone attack drones

And which flag are they flying?

	▲	HarHarVeryFunny a day ago \| parent [-]
		> And which flag are they flying? Sure, use tiny NATO flags if you like, but an "are you one of us" transponder might be better.

▲

KptMarchewa 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_82_bomb

▲

crinkly 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Might want to check the French position there. But you don’t need nuclear weapons to take out munitions factories.

▲

hollerith 2 days ago | parent [-]

>you don’t need nuclear weapons to . . .

GP never implied that the strikes he refers to are nuclear strikes.

▲

crinkly 2 days ago | parent [-]

I am GP :)

	▲	hollerith 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I meant GP (grandparent) relative my comment.

▲

ponector 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Like India striking Pakistan? Or vice versa?