Remix.run Logo
CityOfThrowaway 4 days ago

Yes, it might be true that most people aren't willing to keep their money under their beds for security reasons.

But it shouldn't be illegal or somehow indicative of criminality.

Same thing with self custody of crypto.

kspacewalk2 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's not illegal. They're talking about flagging it as "suspicious". Lots of legal things are flagged as suspicious by law enforcement.

doganugurlu 4 days ago | parent [-]

Would that make it a probable cause for searches and seizures?

If so, that would be pretty bad right?

xp84 4 days ago | parent [-]

Yeah, with the appalling civil forfeiture concept that I hope everyone is aware of, I also feel uncomfortable with this word "suspicious."

In brief summary: If the police search your car (let's just assume probable cause exists) in a routine traffic stop and find say, $50,000 in cash in a bag, they can charge the cash with a crime and arrest it, and unlike a person, it's guilty until definitively proven innocent. I don't think that's fair. And it's a big reason that holding more than a little cash is financially risky.

On the other hand, up till now I'd argue it's more risky (just specifically in terms of potential for loss of the money) to have your BTC in Coinbase or say, FTX where mine was, than in self-custody. These notions may reverse if your crypto private keys can be seized automatically as "suspicious," and the civil forfeiture thing has proven that the police will do that.

1oooqooq 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

it's already illegal. unless you keep tax records and receipts with all that money under your bed, probably cause and civil forfeiture can be broadly applied to it.