▲ | pessimizer 3 days ago | |||||||
Yes, even for things you support. | ||||||||
▲ | labcomputer 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
That sounds like a terrible idea. Suppose a malicious actor wants to prevent something you support. They can simply bring a bill with a poison pill. To use the prior example: They could create a criminal reform act which makes weed legal, but also (by total coincidence) makes child rape legal. Nobody will vote for the pedophiles, so now they have successfully prevented weed legalization for at least 10 years, and they can use a different poison pill next time. Before you say "well, bring it back without the child rape part", see my other comment in this thread about deciding whether two bills are the same. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | pqtyw 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Maybe we should also ban all parties that don't win the election for the next 10-15 years? Makes as much sense... | ||||||||
▲ | michaelt 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Should an outgoing Republican legislature be allowed to deliberately introduce a gun control bill, vote not to pass it, and thereby block an incoming Democratic legislature from passing gun control for their entire term? |