▲ | pyrale 4 days ago | |||||||
You seem to think they’re doing people a favor by selling them their products. I’m fine with apple looking to exit the market and/or harm their product rather than comply. | ||||||||
▲ | ZaoLahma 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
This won't harm Apple or its AirPod product much, if at all. The Apple brand and its eco system is strong enough for the vast majority of average EU customers to ignore the missing features and buy the products regardless (at full price). A missing fringe feature won't drive fans of the eco system away. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | graeme 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
>I’m fine with apple looking to exit the market and/or harm their product rather than comply. It's not clear to me to what extent you disagreed with what I wrote. But, on this point I should point out that every time Apple holds back a feature citing the DMA there is much complaint in Europe. So regardless of what you think it seems a lot of people do care. You appear to have a better understanding of the law: Apple can bring in a feature if all can use it or they can withhold the feature. |