Please make it not ad hominem. That gets old quite quickly.

If the facts are clear please show them. Show the fact that the EU made the decision to not have this feature instead of apple.

▲

urda 5 days ago | parent [-]

> Show the fact that the EU made the decision to not have this feature instead of apple.

It is thanks to EU regulations, which are literal facts in front of us. That’s why the feature isn’t shipped in the EU, because of EU’s own choices. At this point it’s clear you’d rather ignore that, so no reason to keep engaging. One last time: this is on the EU, not Apple.

	▲	preisschild 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> One last time: this is on the EU, not Apple. No, its on Apple, for being anti-competitive.
	▲	notrealyme123 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I can't follow the line of your argument here. You state that I am ignoring the facts, and you counter with an tautology? Sorry but thats just fighting with dirty arguments. You can proof me wrong very easily: Look up the Regulations and check where they disallows such a product on the market. If it's written there then I am wrong and I will take the loss.