What is "inherent" supposed to mean here?

LLMs are understood to the extent that they can be built from the ground up. Literally every single aspect of their operation is understood so thoroughly that we can capture it in code.

If you achieved an understanding of how the human brain works at that level of detail, completeness and certainty, a Nobel prize wouldn't be anywhere near enough. They'd have to invent some sort of Giganobel prize and erect a giant golden statue of you in every neuroscience department in the world.

But if you feel happier treating LLMs as fairy magic, I've better things to do than argue.

Inherent means implicit or automatic as far as I understand it. I have an inherent understanding of my own need for oxygen and food.

I don't have an inherent understanding of English, although I use it regularly.

Treating LLMs as fairy magic doesn't make me feel any happier, for whatever it's worth. But I'm not interested in arguing either.

I never intended to make any claims about how well the principles of LLMs can be understood. Just that none of that understanding is inherent. I don't know why they used that word, as it seems to weaken the post.