|
| ▲ | Dylan16807 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| "It's probably not X, but we should consider X as we look at this." and "I feel like this might be X but I'm 50:50 on it." are not anywhere near defamation. You have to get a lot closer to certainty before it's an issue. And listing out "a possibility but you don't want to dig deeper" is often a good contribution to a conversation. In this case they worded it badly, but the basic idea of the comment isn't awful. |
| |
| ▲ | gchamonlive 4 days ago | parent [-] | | That someone in the team might not have done it on purpose, but left it for convenience? How does that benefit the debate? I really fail to see any silver lining in doing such speculative comments without any substance whatsoever to back it up. |
|
|
| ▲ | TheDong 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's fine, this is an american site so JAQing is in fact safe under free speech. You're welcome to ask b "would none rid me of this meddlesome priest" with no fear |
| |
| ▲ | gchamonlive 4 days ago | parent [-] | | And I'm protected under free speech to try to educate people about good manners, so it's fine too. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
