▲ | rangerelf 4 days ago | |||||||||||||
You're being willfully dense, I do not believe it's up for debate. Governments that public force to kidnap, torture, murder, "disappear" their own citizens, are bad. Plenty of examples to go around, both historically and currently: China, Russia, México, North Korea, Belarus, the balcans, plenty of African governments, etc. It shouldn't matter that "34% of my neighbors" want me sent to a concentration camp, personally I wouldn't want to end up there. The example you're giving, the whole "it really depends on people's views, ..." is a bad government. And the truth is that it's easy to be a good government: don't be bad. Edit: fixed a word. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | jbstack 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Ok, so how do you categorise a country like Norway (typically viewed as a "good" country by most people) which knowingly invests money from its sovereign fund into companies which are linked to the Israeli military which (in many people's view) is currently causing genocide and widespread starvation? At what point does the "good" cross over into the "bad"? Is it ok that having a highly regarded government comes at the price of dead children? How about the sizeable group of people (e.g. in the US and Israel) who don't believe there is any genocide at all? Doesn't that make the whole thing subjective? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | chuckSu 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
You’ve got quite a list of examples there. In 2025 that list of examples should include the US and Israel | ||||||||||||||
|