Nothing. Retirement accounts are tax deferred or tax free. What a weird question to ask.

Well, if you want to tax the stocks that the wealthy own.. why wouldn't you want to tax the stocks that many regular people own? Where do you draw the line between the two?

▲

triceratops 4 days ago | parent [-]

Wealthy people's stock in retirement accounts would also not be taxed. This can be considerable: Peter Thiel's Facebook investment was made in an IRA.

I imagine there'd be some net worth number, excluding retirement accounts, that policy wonks could work up. You draw the line between "wealthy" and "regular" there. Or, more likely, several lines because there would be wealth brackets similar to income brackets. Without that it would be a regressive tax.

▲

tracker1 4 days ago | parent [-]

Why not just tax when someone SELLS the stock, or leverages it for a loan instead? You know, when they actually use it?

I'm actually against property taxes, or any kind of tax where you risk losing property just because you managed to live another year.

	▲	triceratops 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I don't disagree with that. But it's a much bigger discussion. Abolishing all property taxes means city and county finances need fundamental re-working.