▲ | ironman1478 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
You could read the links I posted to see the consequences of extreme policy decisions, like very wide bans on abortions. You can either meet people where they are and try to work with them, or you can be extreme and reap the consequences. It's not like the people of Romania were then or are now woke lefties. Charlie Kirk would've loved Ceausescu. Also read this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980s%E2%80%931990s_Romanian... | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | qcnguy 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> or you can be extreme and reap the consequences This part of your post is very unfortunately worded given the context. I'll try to parse this in the most generous way possible, namely that you're talking about the consequences of abortion on adults and not advocating that right wing Christians "reap the consequences" of their "extreme policy decisions" by being murdered by leftist radicals. Anyway, you're not responding to his point: the consequences of abortion bans are born by the adults instead of the children. Instead your counter-argument is that the consequences are such that violence against the children is legitimate and not "extreme". Kirk's argument is that whatever the consequences are, it doesn't justify violence or murder of children, which is inherently extreme. You aren't rebutting his argument, just restating the left wing position in different words. And Ceausescu was a left wing dictator. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | _rm 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[flagged] | |||||||||||||||||
|