[flagged]

sbierwagen 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Not AI. Indexed in 2020 by the wayback machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20201001000000*/https://www.pipe...

Why GPT writing sounds like the median lazy blog post of five years ago is left as an exercise for the reader.

	▲	5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	jama211 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		But facts? That goes against the hive mind

▲

pgsandstrom 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

What, you think the article was written by AI? Why?

▲

Cthulhu_ 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's 2025, you can flip a coin and be correct half the time, and no consequences if you're wrong.

▲

jama211 5 days ago | parent [-]

Looks like there are consequences, they’re being called out, which is good

	▲	fkyoureadthedoc 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Being called out anonymously and never thinking about it again, that's gotta sting

▲

quietbritishjim 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I guess because it is full of guesswork and devoid of real factual research (at least for the main headline question). But it turns out that bloggers looking for content and lacking any skill are also capable of writing plausible-sounding slop.

	▲	jama211 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		I wouldn’t call this article slop