> Apparently he was someone who was promoting tolerance to more diverse political points of view.

Definitely:

> "I think the Democrats do not believe in the nuclear family, and they've already destroyed it in the macro, and now they're trying to destroy it in the micro."

And this is what I found in 10 seconds. Really fostering that political diversity. He's just another twitter/youtube pundit in the Fox News classic style, and there's endless hours of him talking just like this.

▲

yonran 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I think there’s a kernel of truth in what he said, surrounded by some exaggeration. The rural parts of the country, where people get married under 25 years old and have a higher fertility rate, probably do place a higher value on having a family than the urban parts of the country where career is prioritized. Good politicians (like Barack Obama did in his prime) take pains to acknowledge truths from the other side.

	▲	magicalist 4 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> I think there’s a kernel of truth in what he said, surrounded by some exaggeration lol that just means you agree with him, not that he's encouraging a marketplace of ideas. Your claim was "he was promoting tolerance to more diverse political points of view". Saying "your political point of view has and is destroying the nuclear family" isn't promoting tolerance of it.
	▲	astura 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The rural parts of the country, where people get married under 25 years old are overwhelming divorced by 35. If you call that "place a higher value on having a family" than the low divorce rates of educated, high earning women, then we disagree on definitions.

▲

nailer 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> > Democrats do not believe in the nuclear family

> Really fostering that political diversity.

Yes? Agreement is not diversity.

▲

shdh 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You can have a divergence of opinions while advocating for more dialog and diversity of viewpoints