I agree with you. There should not be sides in the American political system. Yet here we are, because the people we elect seem to want to create a boogeyman in the other "side" and blame all of society's problems on them. Maybe that's just a reflection on American society.

And the news networks eat that shit up. They love a boogeyman, because it's good for ratings.

▲

bb88 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

The news networks and social networks have determined that controversy increases engagement which increases profit.

You could imagine a different algorithm that promoted peaceful, thoughtful interactions. But that would have led to the death of Facebook, twitter, news networks, etc.

We may in fact be here due to sheer greed. The media companies have profited by creating discontent in our society rather than content.

	▲	hattmall 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This really can't be stated loudly enough and they studied it and figured this out with A/B testing and implemented it. It's on the level of tobacco companies covering up cancer.
	▲	abustamam 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		In another HN post about New Mexico offering free childcare, there was a comment that basically hit on the same point [1]. Capitalism has really fucked our society in so many ways. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191517

▲

cryptonector 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have news for you: it's not just American politics that has "sides". In fact, it's exceedingly surprising to me how much politics has aligned (not necessarily in terms of party names and labels) throughout the entire Western world in the past several decades.

▲

abustamam 5 days ago | parent [-]

I don't disagree. I don't know anything about the political systems of other countries. I'm just talking about what I am familiar with, which is the American political system.

You're right, though. Americans actually agree on most things [1]. In that sense, there is really only one "side." Yet the media exploits the small differences that people don't agree upon to create a giant divide.

Anecdote: I firmly believe Trump is going to destroy our democracy, or at least put it to its absolute limits. Yet, I have many friends who voted for Trump. They're great people. We don't ever talk politics, but whenever we talk about economics, or society, we actually agree about most things. If we didn't, we probably wouldn't be friends.

Yet the talking heads on TV would have us believe that democrats and republicans are enemies. And that may very well be a self fulfilling prophecy.

[1] https://apnews.com/article/ap-poll-democracy-rights-freedoms...

▲

lotsofpulp 4 days ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

	▲	abustamam 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		That's your prerogative to choose your friends or definition of good person. I personally think that this mentality divides an already divided nation even more. While I do believe Trump to be a traitor, I believe that folks who voted for him were intentionally manipulated by the talking heads on TV and social media influencers into believing falsehoods and voting against their own self interests. And hey, guess what — many of those who voted for Trump also believe the democrats to be traitors, and that they are seeking to destroy America. Entertaining this division is not good for our country.

▲

lotsofpulp 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]