> actively encouraging assassination and political violence on the other

Quit putting words in my mouth.

I am not encouraging violence or assassination of political differences. I merely said, his death is quite literally _live by the sword, die by the sword_. That's it. He advocated for freedom of firearms, and died by one. Nothing further to it to read into. This is not malice or extolling violence.

Here's a couple of sources of the quote I attribute to him, since you don't believe me or are willfully, obtusely, ignoring what he said.

https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-its-w...

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-gun-deaths-qu...

You've got some issues with reading comprehension. I was (quite obviously) not referring to you there - I was pointing out that those are two different things (in reference to what Mr Kirk said, not you).

I also never denied that the quote was accurate. I drew a distinction between his quote, on the one hand, and actively advocating violence on the other. The only part of this discussion that involved you was related to your apparent inability to understand that distinction.

Getting the vibe this isn't going to be fruitful. Good day.