Because he would then hand you a mic to challenge his point. In a healthy debate. And you connected your own dots on the second point to satisfy your sick sense of justice.

▲

password54321 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Wow what an upstanding guy. He would hand us the mic. For what? To create a thumbnail on YouTube on how you pre-determinately got "owned" before you even received it?

▲

hackable_sand 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A healthy debate about genocide ? ?

	▲	Whoppertime 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Isn't that what happened in 1994? We debated if what was happening in Rwanda was genocide. We debated if there was Genocide in Bosnia between 1992-1995. And then debate what to do about it if we do recognize it as genocide

▲

esalman 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]