I believe this underestimates the difficulty of such an attack and the value of training. This isn't deer hunting where little to nothing is at stake. It's a homicidal attack in the midst of an urban area, with armed law enforcement in the vicinity, the risk of discovery, the knowledge that aggressive pursuit will be immediate, and extreme consequences for the crime.

High pressure.

Under pressure, a poorly trained person is unlikely to be capable of this. It takes some degree of training to simultaneously deal with this pressure and still perform.

▲

chasd00 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Completely untrained yes but there’s lots of people with these skills. I do IDPA matches with my son at a tactical range near Waxahachie TX, people there do these kinds of drills constantly. There’s also lots of ex-military instructor led close quarter and urban combat training available to anyone. Combat trained random people are probably more common than you think. It’s sort of like martial arts, some people are just really into it.

	▲	topspin 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		> I do IDPA matches Yes, this is the level of training I imagine as sufficient. A match applies pressure: you're on a clock, there is an audience, you have a safety regime and people scrutinizing you on it, and at the end, there is a score. I don't claim Fort Benning sniper school is necessary. Only that you likely can't just wander out of a gun shop with your scoped deer rifle at any price and snipe targets at range under pressure: there is more to it than the weapon. > Combat trained random people are probably more common than you think. I listed a wide variety of people with the training I believe is sufficient.

▲

stevenwoo 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I think the two would be Trump assassins being closer and failing back up your argument though one was scared off before he could even take a shot.

	▲	topspin 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		The corollary is Oswald and his crummy surplus carbine making headshots on a moving target. Training.