It is interesting seeing this article come up since just yesterday I setup longhorn in my homelab cluster needing better performance for some tasks than NFS was providing so I setup a raid on my r630 and tried it out.

So far things are running well but I can't shake this fear that I am in for a rude awakening and I loose everything. I backups but the recovery will be painful if I have to do it.

I will have to take a look at rook since I am not quite committed enough yet (only moved over 2 things) to switch.

▲

master_crab 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

If the information is truly important push it off to a database or NAS. I use rook at home but really only for long lived app data (config files, etc). Anything truly important (media, files, etc) is served from an NFS attached to the cluster.

▲

cortesoft 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I have a small 4 node home cluster, and longhorn works great... on smaller volumes.

I have a 15TB volume for video storage, and it can't complete any replica rebuilds. It always fails at some point and then tries to restart.

	▲	nerdjon 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		That is good to know then, I am really just using this for smaller volumes. My media is sitting at about the same size yours is and instead of using PVC's I just have it mounting a straight NFS share specifically for that to avoid any issues there. I think I am likely keeping most of my storage just setup with a storage class that uses my NFS as storage. But longhorn will be used for the things that need to be faster like the databases. I moved jellyfin over to Longhorn and it went from being borderline unusable while metadata was grabbed to actually working well. I can't imagine my biggest volume being more than 100gb, and even that is likely a major over estimation on my part.