[flagged]

j-krieger 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Charlie Kirk was many things, and I disagree with almost any of his positions, but man, Americans should really google the definitions of words like „fascist“ before using them.

	▲	unethical_ban a day ago \| parent [-]
		Stephen Miller, a senior White House official, is calling for anyone who doesn't love Kirk enough to lose their job, their money, and THEN if they broke the law, their freedom. What political ideology supports the government facilitating the loss of financial security due to speech?

▲

AnimalMuppet 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It is better to peacefully respond to fascism with speech until far after the point where most of the loud voices say "we need violence to oppose this!"

There comes a point where you have to oppose fascism with violence. There really does. But wow are people overeager to jump into it.

	▲	protocolture 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		>There comes a point where you have to oppose fascism with violence. I am betting if you read a history of germany, you would probably pick roughly the same point that the US has long since passed as the time to resist openly. Most people do in abstract.
	▲	LocalH 5 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		If we wait as long as you are suggesting, then it's already too late
	▲	5 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	anigbrowl 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Could you use a historical example to articulate where you thought that point was?