[flagged]

▲ AdieuToLogic 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

> All (virtually all, it's not hyperbole) of the "misinformation" during covid turned out not to be that at all

> There was no science behind social distancing, or masks, or the (so called, it's not an actual one) vaccine

These assertions are provably wrong. Regarding "social distancing" specifically:

  There was adequate empirical evidence for the effect of 
  social distancing at the individual level, and for partial 
  or full lockdown at the community level. However, at the 
  level of social settings, the evidence was moderate for 
  school closure, and was limited for workplace/business 
  closures as single targeted interventions.[0]

As to the science behind "masks" and "vaccines", the former can be trivially shown to limit the distance of oral particulate expulsion and the latter has enough published medical research to make verifying vaccine efficacy a matter of accepting facts.

> Edit: I would like to remind people that downvotes do not, and never will, make me wrong

It is not the downvotes which make you wrong.

0 - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9002256/

▲ 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲ robrenaud 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

But being wrong can cause downvotes.

	▲	account42 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Popularity doesn't determine fact. If you cared about science instead of The Science you'd know that.
	▲	alex1138 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[flagged]