▲ | benjiro 4 days ago | |
OrioleDB looks interesting but the with the storage changes, the issue will be the compatability with other extensions. pg_search (paradedb), timescale come to mind. We have seen this issue with YugabyteDB, and their integration off RocksDB as the storage engine for postgresql. | ||
▲ | pella 4 days ago | parent [-] | |
As far as I know, you can run heap and orioledb tables side by side in the same system, so I don’t see a problem using heap-based extensions like timescale together with orioledb. ( of course timescale doesn’t support OrioleDB storage yet, but they can run in parallel. ) and many extensions (e.g. postgis) already work fine with OrioleDB storage. |