|
| ▲ | stevenwoo 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| The January 6 insurrection at the US Congress was based on untruths about the prior election. |
|
| ▲ | Braxton1980 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why? The president of the United States is the most powerful position in the world and therefore it's theft would be a great crime. Accusing the political opposition of this crime in order to gain power is a massive evil |
|
| ▲ | anthem2025 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | cpursley 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
|
| ▲ | elcritch 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Saying he lied about election fraud assumes he knew it was fake and said it anyways. Charlie Kirk may have been incorrect but he generally seemed to believe his positions. |
| |
| ▲ | subpixel 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That is weak sauce. He was a skilled political operator. To suggest he believed what is provably false suggests he was a fool. | | |
| ▲ | hellojesus 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The point is it doesn't matter. Nobody should be murdered for spreading a lie. | | |
| ▲ | subpixel 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Two things can be true at the same time. Spreading lies does matter - it matters a lot. And it's not an excuse for murder. | |
| ▲ | Braxton1980 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You said it was a silly. I was responding to that. I didn't say people should be murdered for spreading a lie. | |
| ▲ | Braxton1980 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] |
|
| |
| ▲ | Braxton1980 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you don't have sufficient evidence for something but make the claim anyway, that's akin to lying. He also didn't suggest it was a possibility he stated it was stolen | |
| ▲ | anthem2025 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
