This isn't really a "finding"- it's a theoretical prediction based on observed data, along with a proposed experimental apparatus to detect such items.

I don't really get excited for theoretical predictions like this - I want experimental observations!

▲

quantum_magpie 3 days ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

dekhn 3 days ago | parent [-]

I have a clue, and my point is not pedantic, it's clarifying. If they found- using experimental apparatus- some physical evidence, it would be a 'finding'.

	▲	plumb_bob_00 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		GP was rude and out of line, but to be frank with you, it is pedantic to quibble about the definition of the word "finding", a word which doesn't even appear in the article (yes, I did see the title). If the research doesn't interest or impress you, there's plenty of other articles.