In my company running maybe 20K servers on .NET, we get a 10-20% CPU decrease every time we upgrade to the next major.

That's impressive, considering a major release is sniped every year. I've never thought it would be that much of an improvement outside of synthetic benchmarks.

▲

cjbgkagh 2 days ago | parent [-]

Managed devs have been begging for such fixes since the start, so many important perf gains were just left on the table at the same time we were being given the message that C++ and Javascript was the future. My exposure to it at MS was during the Win vs Dev Div conflict (the Steve Sinofsky / Steve Balmer era) and the message that managed software was slow was a core part of that battle.

	▲	andix a day ago \| parent [-]
		.NET really failed most its efforts to stay relevant for Desktop applications. Microsoft never really followed through on good UI frameworks. But ASP.NET core is a great platform for any kind of backend application.

▲

doctorpangloss 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Running what application?

	▲	verdie-g 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Adtech, filtering users, selecting campaigns, selecting products, computing "eCPM".
	▲	andix 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		20K servers are probably running a lot of different applications I assume.