▲ | steveBK123 4 days ago | |||||||
I mean we still have headlines coming like this https://fortune.com/2025/09/05/paramount-skydance-ceo-david-... A 10 day notice requiring agreement to full 5 day RTO or take a voluntary package. This from a CEO talking bout 'efficiency' and cost cutting, where I know people who have been 100% remote for 5 years. What are the odds those voluntary packages are worse than whatever contract & law specific in the case of layoffs. And I am sure the (very X/Musk/extreme hardcore coded) agreement employees sign agreeing to RTO means if they are fired later for office attendance its for-cause. | ||||||||
▲ | dragonwriter 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> What are the odds those voluntary packages are worse than whatever contract & law specific in the case of layoffs. Roughly zero, if the scale as a layoff would be sub-WARN Act level, because it is unlikely that the impacted employees had any contractual severance guarantee or any legal entitlement to any notice of termination of employment or pay in lieu (they might be less than the firm’s historical practice for similar roles, and having an excuse to characterize it as voluntary provides a bit of PR cover for that, but that's not a legal or contractual guarantee.) At-will employment is the rule, rather than the exception, for private, non-uniom employment in the US. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[deleted] |