It also seems a lot less strict on what is being terminated.

On violation the Apache 2.0 license terminates the patent license. I might be mistaken, but that reads an awful lot like you're still allowed to use the software provided you do so in a way which doesn't violate the patent.

On the other hand, the OrioleDB license seems to terminate the entire license - so the way I read this it would include parts of the software which aren't covered under the patent itself.

MPLv2 has a stronger version of this (I also personally prefer it in general to Apache-2.0 if you can't stomach GPLv3).