▲ | sensanaty 6 days ago | |||||||
That's only true because of car-centric design, not a rule of the universe. We can easily make public transport the better transport option if we wanted to. Yes, going to bumfuck nowhere will be more efficient by paving 800 miles of concrete, but by definition most people are in urban centers, and there's no reason you can't have cities that are human-friendly while still having cars as options for the people that need it. In the Netherlands, ~65% of people still have cars and take their cars for long journeys, it's just that we have alternative options to get around so the people who can't or don't want to have a car can choose to do so without being crippled in their mobility. | ||||||||
▲ | philipallstar 6 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Well, in the Netherlands it's also very flat, which makes enabling cycling there a much smaller achievement than anywhere else, except possibly Vatican City. Now we have battery-powered bikes more things are accessible for more people, but the clock starts now for those places. | ||||||||
|