▲ | whoiskevin 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
[flagged] | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | kulahan 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This article mostly talks about a program for girls in developing countries, not US students in general, and it barely touches on the topic of food. What happened to NPR? They were my favorite a few years ago, but man this is a bad article. As an aside: I’m fine ending literally any girls’ program that doesn’t have a boys’ equivalent. Boys are in huge trouble. Anyways, this doesn’t support your point well, since it ends by saying they ended up coming to an agreement in ‘16 that still focuses on fruits, veggies, and whole grains. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | scythe 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's not that simple: >This year the federal government reimbursed most schools between 77 cents and $4.58 per lunch meal >[...] >“You’re wasting white milk and money,” wrote Ben, who identified himself as a fourth grader. “Another reason you should bring back chocolate milk is because students are super MAD.” Anyone who has ever bought a lunch knows that you can't get something that's healthy and tastes decent for $4.58. Then there's another wrench thrown in the system by insisting on using fresh ingredients like Gordon Ramsey is watching, which forces deeper cuts on everything else. Some public health officials seem to be chasing a mirage of the artisan school chef who forages for edible clover on the school grounds. The result is that students are handed the cheapest apple money can buy and most of them throw it away. | |||||||||||||||||
|