I find your comment interesting, even though I'm not sure if I really get what you're saying. You built a perpetual motion machine? You then made improvements? Can you share details?

they are claiming that they built a PMM prototype, which is not fully satisfying the business requirements yet, but they are on track to do so based on all the amazing documented validated peer-reviewed published progress they made already over the years!

This is HN so I think it's fine to break standard protocol and clarify: I was joking. Specifically I was riffing off nakamoto_damacy's comment and carrying the comparison (of LLMs) with Perpetual Motion Machines (PMMs) to its logical conclusion.

Good news everyone, you've passed the Turing test.