Because they don't want the public/employees to misconstrue those metrics? Maybe they don't want employees to know how they view productivity?

Surely if they're presented with solid evidence that WFH increases productivity, they'd keep it. Execs make millions in bonuses if the performance of the company hits certain goals. It's baffling that people here still talk about real estate conspiracy theories.

▲

cmiles74 4 days ago | parent [-]

If there were clear metrics showing that in-person teams “out perform” remote teams, we would be hearing about it constantly. The supposed rationale for keeping such data secret sounds far-fetched to me.

▲

aurareturn 4 days ago | parent [-]

The rationale is that there is no upside and pure downside for releasing these metrics to the public. It opens them up to scrutiny.

The evidence is that there have been more RTO calls than companies switching to pure WFH post-Covid.

▲

cutemonster 4 days ago | parent [-]

If more people eat hamburgers than vegetables, you'll start saying that that's evidence that hamburgers are more healthy?

▲

aurareturn 4 days ago | parent [-]

It'd be evidence that people enjoy eating hamburgers more than vegetables.

	▲	nextaccountic 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, but managers enjoying RTO doesn't mean that it's good for the company