Crazy how “chainsaw”, “musk”, and “revved” don’t show up anywhere in the article.

You’d think people this angry would at least have a basis for it!

> in the article

Why on earth would it be? You've lost the thread, this is about djinnandtonic's claims, not what the article says. Here, a quick recap:

1. djinnandtonic: I have no sympathy for the complaining farmers in this article, who are probably ones that cheered a separate chainsawing-bureaucrats event. They willfully chose a cruel mess.

2. NotGMan: Comparing the misfortune of good farmers to the misfortune of bad bureaucrats is unfair.

3. Terr: djinanndtonic wasn't comparing the two groups, djinnandtonic was using that event to to argue that rural farmers' voted for the mess they find themselves in.

4. Kulahan: Which line says farmers are voting that way?

5. Terr: djinanndtonic's line right here about the chainsawing-bureaucrats thing, because it's a reference to [...]

6. Kulahan: OMG THAT LINE ISN'T EVEN IN THE ARTICLE!111

7. Terr: Of course it isn't, because the article wasn't about their vote patterns, that was introduced in the HN comment that NotGMan critiqued. Here's a recap [Recursion Error Detected]