▲ | guiriduro 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Two things about backdoor layoffs. Mostly its about who. When its corporate dictat, those most likely to leave are those with other options, ie the best talent. So sure a business might save on severances in aggregate, but it doesn't get to decide on who, but simple statistics show it will be the best who move on. So a demoralised and increasingly mediocre workforce is then faced with a much tougher hiring environment with unfillable positions and the downward cycle continues, destroying customer value and reputation to a far greater degree than any temporary layoff savings. All for what exactly, control? Its the C-suites that should be being marched out the door. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | mhuffman 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>All for what exactly, control? No, quarterly earnings. In this case, retained earnings, but they want to show profits in a situation with high inflation, stagnant employment, and other issues where customers are not as spendy as they once were. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | pjmlp 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The move of offshoring in many projects, changed my mindest that companies care one second about their talent, at a size like Microsoft is all about replaceable cogs, little ants every doing their own small task. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | otikik 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
"My bonus is tied to making the line go up this quarter" |