▲ | TACD 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
My pet theory about why the Minis sold poorly is that the 12 Mini was released just a few months after the SE 2; I suspect a lot of the would-be Mini purchasers had just bought an SE 2 instead (not knowing the Mini was just around the corner), and are also not a demographic interested in upgrading their phone every year. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | mrweasel 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Didn't the SE models sell notoriously bad as well? There are always a bunch of us who wants a smaller phone, but the sales number indicates that we are the minority. To some extend I also think it explains the increasingly thin phones. With the increases in screen size, they need to make the phones thinner, otherwise it would feel like a brick in your pocket. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | HumblyTossed 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I always point out that the minis were a billion dollar product. Most companies would DIE for a billion dollar product. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | brightbeige 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
My theory is rather about battery life: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | port11 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
My pet theory is that having to charge the phone twice a day was a deal breaker. We wanted small, not "impossibly thin" and always dead. |