Apple is generally anti market hype. It is a smart PR move to avoid mentioning AI after the Apple Intelligence fiasco, their researchers leaving, and the bubble sentiment at the moment.

▲

pradn 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's not a smart move to avoid integrating the most important capability advance in computing in the past decade - LLMs. They do support small cases, like summarizing text. But there's scope to do more.

▲

adastra22 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You are missing the point. Why was Apple Intelligence a fiasco? Because they failed to understand what users like GP wanted.

▲

mgh2 a day ago | parent [-]

It failed to deliver on its promises, investors sued them from overstating AI capabilities.

IMO, it was the researcher team's fault, good riddance.

	▲	adastra22 a day ago \| parent [-]
		no, I placed this squarely on apple‘s shoulders. There are real use cases for new AI tools that are actually useful. Use cases that Apple is already invested into — Siri, text to speech & vice versa, etc. many of these have open source models that they could very easily be integrating into their product, even if they didn’t have a partnership with the premier AI research lab. Instead, we got, what? An automated memeoji maker? Holy hell they dropped the ball on this.