▲ | lqstuart 5 days ago | |
The fact that there’s even a debate about banning smart phones in classrooms tells you all you need to know. Cell phones were de facto banned in school in like 2002, not sure when it became the norm but it seems like a no brainer. | ||
▲ | nonethewiser 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is what I thought of immediately as well. I remember being shocked to learn that phones were allowed. Of course thats not going to work out well. There are so many factors to the negative education outcomes but this policy is just obvious. I guess its actually the parents who insist on being able to reach their kid at any moment? | ||
▲ | elric 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
To some extent this is one of the recommendations of the PISA 2022 report, but it comes with a big caveat: > 4. Limit the distractions caused by using digital devices in class >Students who spent up to one hour per day on digital devices for learning activities in school scored 14 points higher on average in mathematics than students who spent no time. Enforced cell phone bans in class may help reduce distractions but can also hinder the ability of students to self-regulate their use of the devices. I don't think a simple blanket ban on smartphones in schools is likely to solve much. | ||
▲ | its-kostya 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Agreed. The argument "I want to know if my child is safe in an emergency" is incredibly flawed. God forbid there is a shooting, kids should be listening to their teachers to be instructed to safety not distracted. And their phones should not make noise when they are hiding. If the emergency is on the outside of school, parents still need to go through the main office to pull kids out of school, so contacting them is also unnecessary. These helicopter parents smh |