▲ | teachrdan 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> They do a pretty good job at it when you factor in long term pensions and health care. They only get good pensions and health care because school districts refuse to give them better salaries instead. And good health care (really, health insurance) is crucial because health care costs can obviously bankrupt you in America. > They create artificial barriers like requiring multiple years of certifications to purposefully limit the pool of competition How is requiring the equivalent of a master's degree an "artificial barrier"? Surely, new teachers should have some experience and theoretical background before standing in front of 30-100+ students and being responsible for their education? Florida passed a law making it possible for veterans to teach without even having a bachelor's degree. Does that sound like a good idea to you? Would requiring even a bachelor's degree be an "artificial barrier" in your opinion? | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | braincat31415 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
An average teacher salary in Chicago projected in their new contract is $110,000, plus pensions and heathcare on top of that. What better salary do you have in mind? An average individual salary in Chicago is about 45k. They are still wining about this number and go on strikes pretty much every other year. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | strken 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm not as familiar with the US, but Australia moved from requiring teachers to complete a 1-year graduate diploma, to a 2-year master of education. This is effectively doubling the commitment for someone to transfer into teaching from another field. Requiring anything at all is by definition an artificial barrier. Some are justified and some are not. In this case, I question whether a longer education necessarily benefits students. |