▲ | teucris 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
That requires the operating system to “hint” to the display that there’s no refresh necessary and for the display to shut down during those times. That’s currently not supported as these kits just take a video signal, but it’s something being worked on for a future version! | ||||||||||||||
▲ | ahartmetz 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Edit: You work on that stuff, right? Then this armchair experting feels silly, just imagine it's for other readers. It seems much more practical (if a little less power-efficient) to implement the no diff -> no refresh logic for screen regions in the display hardware. The RAM and logic for a display-side framebuffer can't be expensive today, a couple of Euros for the extra board space and chip(s). If that stuff takes off, just additional transistors in the all-in-one ASIC. For the whole screen, that more or less already exists in laptop hardware: "panel self-refresh". HDMI and DiplayPort might need a new extension or something? Is there anything? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | vincnetas 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
“Traditionally, the [e-paper display] controller used a single-state machine to control the entire panel, with only two states: static and updating,” says Modos cofounder Wenting Zhang. “Caster treats each pixel individually rather than as a whole panel, which allows localized control on the pixels.” |