> Penalties to be applied in cases of criminal copyright infringement (i.e., violations of 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)), are set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 2319. Congress has increased these penalties substantially in recent years, and has broadened the scope of behaviors to which they can apply. See this Manual at 1847.

> Statutory penalties are found at 18 U.S.C. § 2319. A defendant, convicted for the first time of violating 17 U.S.C. § 506(a) by the unauthorized reproduction or distribution, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, or 1 or more copyrighted works, with a retail value of more than $2,500 can be imprisoned for up to 5 years and fined up to $250,000, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2319(b), 3571(b)(3).

If you broaden it to include DMCA violations you could spend a lot of time in jail. It's even worse in some other countries.

▲

Lerc 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Does the $2500 count if it is 25 $100 instances? Similarly does the 10 copies cover 10 items copied once or does it need to be one item copied at least 10 times?

	▲	lazide 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		If you piss off someone enough to care, they’ll do the maximum and see if you plea down - or the judge agrees. With a typical torrenter, it would be straightforward to make some truly monumental penalties. The reality is, they rarely care.

▲

stevage 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Are there any examples of small-time infringers actually going to jail?

	▲	sokoloff 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Given the topic at hand, would you consider Anthropic’s actions “small-time infring[ing]”?