Remix.run Logo
ndiddy 6 days ago

I think folding phones will remain a small niche unless someone figures out how to make a foldable screen that doesn't get permanently scratched by your fingernails.

ugh123 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

The "unless" argument is where apple has done well:

- mobile mp3 player sales are low unless disk and battery life are greatly improved

- large display touch screen phone market is small unless someone solves the "app problem"

- smart watch market is tiny if exists at all unless someone makes one that is useful and has improved battery life

kennywinker 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Pebble had like a week long battery life. Apple’s pitch wasn’t better battery life, it was just “that thing for nerds? This is the same, but for everyone else.” I.e. it came with seamless integration with your phone, rings to close, a more expensive look, and more polished fitness tracking.

The breakthru that made touchscreen phones works wasn’t an app ecosystem. That came after people were already crazy about iPhones. It was capacitive touch screens. Basically everything before was resistive touch, which is why they usually had styluses. Getting touch, and really multi-touch, working well was the game changer that redefined cell phones.

blobbers 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

To be fair, Apple Watch battery life is atrocious compared to competing models. Their marketing and ecosystem is better.

bentcorner 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

IMO there's a gap between "charge every day" and "charge once a week" that needs to be crossed.

In other words, if they made the battery last twice as long it'd still be equally as annoying (since your daily routine would be nearly the same, except now you also need to remember if it's a charge day or non-charge day).

To be fair maybe 3/4 days buys you some convenience. But anyways charging once a day is a reasonable place to get to, to get something better would require at minimum a 3x improvement which probably means a ground-up rework instead of continuous refinement.

A battery band might get you there but I suspect it'd be too clunky. At best Apple may redesign their watch to support a battery band and allow 3rd parties to make them for folks that need weeks of battery life.

apparent 5 days ago | parent [-]

For me, it comes down to two things. First, I do not want to have to charge every night since I use my watch as a silent vibrating alarm, and I track my sleep. It seems like Apple has basically overcome this hurdle, now that you can charge while you shower and basically get by.

The other issue is that I don't want to have to bring Yet Another Dongle™ every time I go away for a weekend or short business trip. Most of my trips are ≤ 4 days, so if AWs could reliably go that long (including battery degradation over time) then I'd consider getting one.

Right now, only the AWU even approaches this, and only in low-power mode. If it weren't a thousand dollars, I'd consider it. But between the low-power requirement and the pricing, it's just no contest in my book. I'm getting a new Pebble, which offers a month of battery life at 1/3 of the cost.

gf000 4 days ago | parent [-]

> The other issue is that I don't want to have to bring Yet Another Dongle™

I think reverse charging from your smartphone is a quite decent solution to the problem, which is supported by certain Android devices.

apparent 4 days ago | parent [-]

If this were possible, it would definitely make a difference for me.

Nevermark 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am surprised Apple doesn't sell a battery band for people who want a weeks charge.

blobbers 2 days ago | parent [-]

That would be slick. Perhaps the problem is it would get hot, and possibly burn?

KoolKat23 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I watched the announcement yesterday and was very surprised to hear the watch battery life is still so shocking.

Especially considering how useful sleep data is, then I was surprised to see they're only getting sleep scores now.

My dirt cheap Huawei watches have had this for years. It's accurate enough (my own perception based on use). And I get a weeks battery life too (although I don't have the distracting fancy notifications perhaps). It does check blood oxygen levels, heart rate, stress etc.

I truly thought this was a solved problem (looking at headphones battery life, although I might need to check my assumptions here also apply to Airpods).

ralfd 5 days ago | parent [-]

The watch has sleep data (for example phase durations like rem sleep and apnoe), the health app just doesn’t compute a „score“.

> I truly thought this was a solved problem.

I charge when showering in the morning. 15 minutes is enough for the day + night, half an hour to charge it fully.

KoolKat23 3 days ago | parent [-]

That's not bad

seesaw 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I switched from Apple Watch to a Garmin Venu. The battery lasts for a week, and many of the sensors are more accurate.

wooger 5 days ago | parent [-]

And that's the fancy screen, gimmick edition garmin watch - the normal MIP display garmin watches (even an old, midrange Forerunner 255) will easily get a couple of weeks of battery life, more for the higher end ones.

OLED is just the wrong screen tech for these devices, never made any sense to me given how little I care about graphics and how little time I spend reading the display.

gf000 4 days ago | parent [-]

But it's not the screen that causes it to lose energy as fast, but the general purpose OS with a decent CPU.

wahnfrieden 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

New one is 24 hours is that still atrocious

klardotsh 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Yes. My Pebble Steel got over a week of battery in 2015, had physical, tactile buttons that worked even wearing thick winter gloves, and had an always-on-no-matter-what screen that was clearly readable in full sunlight.

Every smartwatch that hasn't met that bar, which is almost all of them ever made, is a joke to me. I'd have ordered a RePebble had I not moved back to analogue dumbwatches instead just before they were announced (and were iOS not actively hostile to competing watch implementations).

brookst 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

And motorcycles get way better gas mileage than cars. But it’s still odd to frame a (totally understandable!) preference for one product category in those terms.

qwezxcrty 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you are okay with less smart smart watches, and okay with no hackability, Garmin should have a few with black and white display and >1 week battery life (even indefinite with sufficient solar).

qwertytyyuu 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That’s not really the same category of device

wahnfrieden 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Isn’t that a laggy b&w screen, with no ability to respond to notifs, no cellular. I guess those are ok for some users

monkeywork 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

depends which camp of apple watch (or smart watch in general) users you are asking.

the camp that sees the smartwatch as an accessory to their smartphone that does fitness tracking and maybe a few other useful things to avoid pulling their phone out constantly - those people want MUCH longer battery life.

the camp that sees the smartwatch as a REPLACEMENT to their smartphone, they are perfectly fine with the current battery life.

Oreb 6 days ago | parent [-]

I am closer to the first camp than the second, and I don’t understand why I would need longer battery life. The watch charges very quickly, and there is never a day when I don’t have the chance to charge at some point. I usually do it during my morning shower.

wooger 5 days ago | parent [-]

1. People use these GPS watches for Ironman triathlons, ultra running & cycling events etc. They can't and won't charge before the battery is done - and remember the battery with a daily charge will degrade significantly. If it's borderline on release, it'll be inadequate after a year.

2. Just for general convenience, having to take another special cable for every late night or overnight trip is maddening. I always have a phone anyway for any actual interactions.

I find it hard to believe many people are writing texts on their watches, it's just a nice to have gimmick feature that everyone I know has stopped using.

gf000 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

> and remember the battery with a daily charge will degrade significantly. If it's borderline on release, it'll be inadequate after a year.

That has not been my experience though - having used both an Apple Watch and a Pixel Watch for years on end every single day. Absolutely outside my area of expertise, but I would imagine that you can design batteries to have a much longer lifetime (no of recharge cycles) when their capacity is smaller.

NetMageSCW 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

That’s not how Lion charging works - degradation and lifetime (to a first approximation) depend on full charges. If you charge daily from 80% to 100% or charge every 5 days from 1% to 100%, your battery degradation and lifetime will be the same.

ericd 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yep, easily the worst part of mine, especially since it has to charge at a different time than my phone to allow for sleep tracking.

brewdad 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My biggest complaint with my Apple Watch is that I have to choose between sleep tracking and being able to wear my watch all day.

KiwiJohnno 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, my 5 year old Garmin still lasts about 10 days. And thats with using GPS tracking + bluetooth audio for multiple recorded activities.

whatevaa 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes. Simply yes for a lot of people.

wahnfrieden 6 days ago | parent [-]

Are those people who don’t need interactivity, ability to respond to notifs, cellular, etc or are you comparing with something comparable

michaelt 6 days ago | parent [-]

I think a lot of people reach into their pocket and get their phone out if they need "interactivity, ability to respond to notifs, cellular, etc"

But if you want to leave your smartphone at home, but you still want cellular and notifications, I agree the apple watch is the only game in town even if the battery life sucks.

zdw 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Most of this is because of the always-on screen. If you can live without it and switch back to the motion or button to wake mode, you get 30-50% more usage before the battery runs out, which is not a huge improvement but is a legitimate option.

A side effect is that this makes your watch look less new, and therefore less of a theft target.

numpad0 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

real watches last like 24 months minimum

swores 6 days ago | parent [-]

And bicycles go much further without needing petrol than cars.

I agree that Apple Watches don't last long enough between charges, but comparing them to a completely different class of device that's technically the same broad category is pointless.

criley2 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is this a thing? I've been using a Pixel 9 Pro Fold for one full year now and my inner screen looks pretty flawless. I don't see a single scratch, and I've never used any kind of protector on the inside. This kind of sounds like a "sour grapes" excuse where a really good thing is presumed to suck only because you can't have it. Personally, as someone who isn't really interested in a full tablet, the foldable is really really nice.

ndiddy 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Is this a thing?

From Google's official Pixel 9 Pro Fold handling instructions: (https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15090466?hl=en#...)

> Flexible screens are softer than traditional phone screens, so avoid contact with sand, crumbs, *fingernails* and sharp objects.

amelius 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

-> sour apple

I'm sure that if Apple invented the exact same thing in the exact same way, it would have been the "greatest thing since sliced bread".

fumar 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I have an OG Pixel Fold and the inner screen is flawless. My iPhone 14 Pro screen is visibly scratched. The Fold replaced tablets and e readers for me.

dankwizard 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Or an actual seemless hinge. My god are they ugly down the bend.

baby 6 days ago | parent [-]

it's invisible if you look straight at your phone, never bothered me

dankwizard 5 days ago | parent [-]

Unfortunately my eyes can see it.

baby 5 days ago | parent [-]

Look at the latest model, your eyes won't see it. Stop spreading FUD

dankwizard 5 days ago | parent [-]

I don't know what to tell you - I don't want to brag about my eyesight, but it's pretty good - No matter what angle, no matter what phone, the crease is visible. What would I have to gain lying about this? I could say the same thing - Stop trying to copium your purchase?

The tech isn't there yet.

baby 4 days ago | parent [-]

Except it is, just try the new models

Theodores 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It is a feature, not a bug.

For those that are not chronically online, a mobile phone from a decade ago has everything they need. If you only have to phone the family, WhatsApp your neighbours, get the map out, use a search engine and do your online banking, then a flagship phone is a bit over the top. If anything, the old phone is preferable since its loss would not be the end of the world.

I have seen a few elderly neighbours rocking Samsung Galaxy S7s with no need to upgrade. Although the S7 isn't quite a decade old, the apps that are actually used (WhatsApp, online banking) will be working with the S7 for many years to come since there is this demographic of active users.

Now, what if we could get these people to upgrade every three years with a feature that the 'elderly neighbour' would want? Eyesight isn't what it used to be in old age, so how about a nice big screen?

You can't deliberately hobble the phone with poor battery life or programme it to go slow in an update because we know that isn't going to win the customer over, but a screen that gets tatty after three years? Sounds good to me.

epolanski 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

> the apps that are actually used (WhatsApp, online banking) will be working with the S7 for many years to come

I have several apps that no longer work on my otherwise good phone bought in 2018 because I can no longer update the OS that they require.

bayindirh 6 days ago | parent [-]

Can you give any examples? My apps only stop upgrading, not stop working out of the blue.

Edit: This is a honest question.

epolanski 6 days ago | parent [-]

Banking apps are a common example that requires you to be on latest, yet my phone is stuck in Android 10 land.

Whatsapp also no longer works on it, thus the phone is useless.

Which is sad, as it has a great camera, battery life and is very light.

YeahThisIsMe 6 days ago | parent [-]

That sounds like LG. Amazing camera and audio and I'm never buying one again.

scheeseman486 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Should be easy given they haven't made them for over 4 years.

epolanski 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8.

https://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_redmi_note_8-9814.php

ta1243 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's the software updates that's the problem. Apple aren't too bad, but their hardware support only seems to last 7 years.

The S7 you mention lasted 4 years, and received the last patch in 2020.

Not convinced that doing online banking on a phone that hasn't had software updates for 5 years is a good idea.

pdimitar 3 days ago | parent [-]

It's definitely a bad idea but people hate being coerced into spending $500+ just to continue doing what they already do.

A lot of us the techies can be strong-armed via FOMO and other tropes but good luck convincing the elderly neighbors.

somewhereoutth 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Samsung Galaxy A40 checking in.

It's small, has dual sim card sockets, and a headphone jack.

I'm not sure how I'd replace it to be honest.

autoexec 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm still want a phone with expandable storage and a headphone jack. Sony had one, but I don't know if they're selling them and I've heard they have their own issues too.

Nursie 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Honest question here - is there a situation where you need to be able to use the headphone jack and USB-C at the same time?

Because there are very cheap, lightweight adaptors to headphone jack from USB-C.

somewhereoutth 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

One extra 'thing' to need - at the moment I know that I can play music through anything that has a line-in, with just a cable. However Bluetooth seems to work ok - for devices that support it.

smelendez 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not OP but my concern is putting strain on the charging port by walking with headphones while my phone is in my pocket.

Wireless chargers are pretty good but it’s still a pain to wear out your port.

Nursie 6 days ago | parent [-]

There are some 90-degree adapters that would probably minimise that.

I can dual-SIM my iphone by using one e-Sim and one physical. The only thing it is not, is small...