This is becoming comical. iPhone Air only supports USB 2 speeds. Seriously? Also iPhone Pro only comes with USB 3 speeds while amplifying ProRes RAW support...

▲

gambiting 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think I have ever plugged in my phone, like at all, ever, and it's not even an iPhone. And if I want to get any photos/videos I made with it, they are just in Google photos?

Like I get there are some people who maybe use the thing as an actual camera and they suddenly need to download tens if not hundreds of gigabytes of media off the phone but like.....I guess it's just not the phone for them? And like you said the Pro supports USB3 speeds so what's the issue? 5gbps is really not fast enough?

▲

STELLANOVA 6 days ago | parent [-]

That is really wrong way of looking at things. USB 4 support doesn't require ANY innovation from Apple, any extra $$$ (maybe pennies) - it's pure representation that they lost focus and simply don't care. That port is CRITICAL for many things they actually focused on in the prerecorded ads we all watched today - video. All add-ons, storage are in 99% of cases directly connected to the phone via USB-C port. To not support the latest technology available but charge premium is really disappointing...

	▲	gambiting 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		I think calling it critical is massively overestimating how important it is to almost anyone, but that doesn't mean your need isn't valid. Out of curiosity, are there any phones from any manufacturer that support USB4 and can actually transfer data at more than 5gbps?

▲

zhobbs 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I've never transferred data over a wire to or from my iPhone, interesting that this is important for some use cases.

▲

coolspot 6 days ago | parent [-]

Backing up your 1TB phone without taking whole house wi-fi bandwidth for 12 hours is one.

▲

swiftcoder 6 days ago | parent [-]

... what is wrong with your wifi, that its non-functional with <200 mbps of transfer?

▲

Nextgrid 6 days ago | parent [-]

200mbps is still wishful thinking in a typical household with ISP-provided consumer-grade router/AP in a suboptimal location. At the very least it will slow everything else down while it takes ~11 hours at a sustained 200mbps to transfer 1TB.

	▲	swiftcoder 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Not sure that I expect the average hacker news commenters to stick with their ISP-provided router in a suboptimal location - you can pick up a wifi6 router for under $100, that will happily maintain gigabit speeds over a normal-sized house