▲ | privatelypublic 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why rely on them at all? Dollar per GB they cost more than literally any other solution with file storage. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | homebrewer 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Years ago, their desktop client was the only one among popular similar services that supported proper delta sync while also covering all major platforms. Absolutely indispensable if you used it with things like TrueCrypt containers, where changing one byte within would cause most sync clients to resend the whole 50 GB, or however large it was. Dropbox handled this fine and would finish in a couple of seconds (actually sending new data, not just pretending it did that). I don't know how it is these days, wouldn't be surprised if other commercial services still haven't figured it out. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | a0123 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The only cloud storage that has a decent Linux client is Dropbox. Koofr is a decent cloud solution. Their client is horrendous across all platforms and lacks the most basic functionalities. You can argue OneDrive / GoogleDrive are semi decent if you also use insync, which adds another license to purchase when a basic client should come free with the service you've already bought. And no, rsync doesn't come even close to it in terms of functionality/simplicity, no matter how much hardened Linux users who haven't been outside since 1988 are trying to convince everyone otherwise. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | bayindirh 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Because they provide nice features on top of basic file storage. If you use them, they justify the cost. If you don't need them, there's always pCloud. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|