▲ | evantbyrne 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nobody said homesteading is the solution. Allowing a parent of young children to care for them is not a radical idea though. It should not be hard to imagine a society that is more flexible to childcare being performed by parents, because that was the norm for all of human history prior to industrialization. People should seriously consider the ways in which their imaginations on this subject (and others!) are constrained by their post industrial upbringing, and importantly, why the current norms exist and who they benefit. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | toomuchtodo 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indeed, this only occurs with unions and rising wages, where a single income from a secure job can support a family while a parent stays home to perform childrearing. Are we there? When will we get there? These are important questions to ask if this is a dependency to improving household financials to encourage the outcome in this context (a stay at home parent). If jobs are tenuous or insecure, long term financial obligations will not be made (the cost to raise a child in 2023 dollars is $330k, not including childcare or college). If jobs do not pay enough, people will need to put their kids in childcare (which will have to be subsidized) or they will forgo having children [1] [2]. [1] https://www.marketplace.org/story/2024/07/29/fewer-adults-ha... [2] https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2024/07/25/reasons... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|