▲ | ViewTrick1002 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> You might think dispatchable natural gas fired plants with some kind of carbon capture would help but with amine-based carbon capture the capital cost is high, just like with nuclear, so you are looking at a high multiple of what it would cost to add carbon capture to a coal plant that runs continuously. Calcium-based chemical cycling, metal-organic-frameworks and such offer some hope for lowering costs but probably not enough for those scenarios. I think you are missing far simpler solutions for what is in terms of TWh needed a tiny problem. Why not just use biofuels, synfuels or hydrogen? Whatever the aviation and the maritime shipping industries settles on since they are unable to in the foreseeable future decarbonize with batteries. The US today produces enough ethanol for gas blending to run the entire grid for 16 days without help. As we switch to BEVs it is trivial to repurpose that for the grid, while also ensuring that the inputs decarbonize as well. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | WalterBright 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydrogen has a major storage problem. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|