▲ | rlpb 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That never happens because the appointed regulator has no incentive to efficiently and effectively regulate, either. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | braza 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In this case, the core issue is still not the privatization intrinsically, but the mechanisms of corruption and competing interests with some other areas. I'm not a free market absolutist or a privatization zealot, but I'm curious about the fact that England cannot come up with a privatization model that ensures clawback and exit clauses, measurable goals, and a clear investment plan for it. Even Brazil 5 years ago made a Law for the universalization of water and sewage. The goals are given in a clear-cut way: > The Sanitation Framework standardizes deadlines and criteria nationwide: by 2033, 99% of the population must have access to water. Today, 30 million Brazilians still lack this service. The country also needs to achieve 90% access to sewage collection and treatment, a service currently not provided to 90 million Brazilians. Furthermore, water losses must be reduced from the current 40% to 25%. [1] > Since 2020, 59 auctions have been held in 20 states, benefiting 1,529 municipalities and more than 73 million people. The contracts provide for R$178 billion in direct investments and R$56.9 billion in concession fees, totaling more than R$234.9 billion committed to the sector (for the private investment). [2] There the responsibility for water distribution and sewage is within municipalities, and the biggest issue is that small ones cannot finance such a kind of service that demands high upfront investment and maintenance costs. The point that I want to make here, is that the biggest issue might be the lack of enforcement and regulatory effectiveness, plus bad legal framework and contracts. [1] - https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2025/09/04/san.... [2] - https://www.gov.br/cidades/pt-br/assuntos/noticias-1/noticia... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | kolektiv 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Particularly when, as in the case of UK water privatisation, there's a fairly convenient revolving door between the supposed regulator and the privatised water companies. Poacher turned entirely ineffective and rather friendly gamekeeper... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|